Why are revenue-based VCs investing in so many women and underrepresented founders?

This post was originally published on this site

Curated by: Startups

 

David Teten Contributor Share on Twitter David Teten is a Venture Partner with HOF Capital. He was previously a Partner for 8 years with HOF Capital and ff Venture Capital. David writes regularly at teten.com and @dteten. More posts by this contributor Why are revenue-based VCs investing in so many women and underrepresented founders? Who are the major revenue-based investing VCs?

This guest post was written by David Teten, Venture Partner, HOF Capital. You can follow him at teten.com and @dteten. This is part of an ongoing series on revenue-based investing VC that will hit on:

Revenue-based investing: A new option for founders who care about control Who are the major revenue-based investing VCs? Should your new VC fund use revenue-based investing? Why are revenue-based VCs investing in so many women and underrepresented founders? Should you raise equity venture capital or revenue-based investing VC?

A new wave of revenue-based investors are emerging who are using creative investing structures with some of the upside of traditional VC, but some of the downside protection of debt.

I’ve been a traditional equity VC for 8 years, and I’m researching new business

contactedorg

%d bloggers like this: